Archive for the ‘Education’ Category

From Baskets to Bytes

July 18, 2008

Originally posted 2005-08-03

Several years ago, the teacher for my Composition II class assigned a personal-experience essay. In that essay, I chose to write about home-schooling’s impact on my education and career thus far. Since we’re on the topic of home-schooling anyway, I’m posting a redacted copy of this essay below. The essay can be read as fairly egotistical. “Tooting my own horn” is not my intent; it’s not difficult to find someone more skilled than me in any area, and my talents and circumstances are gifts from God. Also, I didn’t discuss in the essay my appetite for “mind candy”–mysteries, action novels, etc.

That said…read, evaluate, criticise, and enjoy.

From Baskets to Bytes

I never received a high-school diploma. My grade-school diploma came from an unaccredited private school, and I never had anything really good for show-and-tell in the early grades. I was always at the bottom of my class in school; I never could finish my homework as quickly as could most of my friends. As dismal as my educational state may sound, though, it gives me no cause for alarm. Instead of a high-school diploma, I’m pursuing a college degree. The “unaccredited private school” I attended was in my home, and I was, as the only person in my “class”, perpetually at the top of the class as well as at the bottom. As a homeschooled student, I naturally had more “homework” than my peers, but the freedom to proceed at my own pace with individualized instruction allowed an extremely flexible schedule, freeing time to pursue education in informal ways: besides formal learning, I “showed” and I “told” all the time. The flexibility provided by homeschooling has proven a great boon, enhancing my pursuit of educational and career goals by allowing me to read broadly, to pursue interests to a meaningful depth, and to achieve excellence in my profession through hands-on experience.

An unconventional start to my education set the stage for years of “odd” but effective learning to come: My mother began teaching me to read not by teaching me the alphabet, but by teaching me the sounds of letters. By the time of a checkup at the doctor’s office when I was five years old, I was able to read aloud to him his credentials posted on the wall, but I couldn’t recite the alphabet for him. I developed a love for books at an early age, and visited the public library frequently. Books of almost any sort interested me: from Asimov’s “Foundation” series to collections of “Mathematical Games” columns, from Fahrenheit 451 to The Black Stallion, from Tolkien to C.S. Lewis. I became well-known at the library: I was the kid who took home (literally) a laundry-basket of books at a time. Though I did have to spend time regularly in my core studies, algebra and grammar paled in comparison to the intellectual pleasure from games of logic, to the shudder from Jackson’s “The Lottery”, to the excitement as hobbits cleansed the last vestiges of Mordor’s darkness from their home. Through reading, I gained a wealth of knowledge and learned to appreciate a vast treasury of thought. (Broad reading also contributed to my winning the local County Spelling Bee in seventh grade; studying for the competition reciprocally increased my vocabulary dramatically.) Though formal education provided an essential part of my learning, I gained much value by having sufficient time free to read.

Though I enjoyed many kinds of books, I found myself returning often to a few core interests: computers, logic, mathematics, and investment. Flexibility in my curriculum allowed me to develop these interests. Before my family ever purchased a computer, I had spent numerous hours poring over colorful children’s books detailing how to “create” games for your own computer in BASIC, an elementary programming language. I brought home logic-puzzle books literally by the dozen, and investment books received similar attention. When I was 11, my father purchased a computer, and I began to explore the possibilities of programming and to integrate several of my interests. I wrote a math-review program, a program to visualize the Mandelbrot set (a fractal image generated by iteratively applying a formula to complex numbers), a program to calculate the growth of money under various conditions, and numerous other programs, each of which developed my knowledge a little further. Before long my father, noting my interest in programming, suggested that I learn a “real” programming language in a course at the local community college. The thought excited me, and so it happened that at 13 years old I found myself sitting in a basement classroom from 6 to 10 PM on Thursday evenings learning the lingua franca of the programming world, the language “C++”.

Though after finishing my class in C++ I knew an industry-standard programming language, I still had no real-world experience in its application. My mother, though, had the perfect solution. “Doesn’t A work as a programmer? And didn’t he get all his training on the job? Maybe you could work for the same person he works for!” Although we didn’t know that B, A’s employer, was currently looking for new employees in his software-development company, this sounded like a perfect opportunity. Mom wrote B a letter, describing my training and experience thus far and asking if he had any openings. Several days later, B called back. After several telephone conversations with me and my parents (I was, after all, still 13 at the time), we agreed on a plan: B would design a utility program to coordinate his development team’s work, and he would contract with my father for the creation of the utility, but allow him to dispose of the contract as he wished. Translated, this meant that I would write the program under A’s supervision and tutelage, free of child-labor concerns. Since my school schedule could flex to accommodate some work during normal working hours, I would in this way receive on-the-job training simultaneously with my completion of high school. B, who had previously taught programming at the graduate level, believed this “apprenticeship” method of training to be far superior* to that available through a computer-science degree, and hoped to gain a highly-qualified programmer through it. Apprenticeship has indeed proved to be an excellent model of learning. Through the experience of working closely with a knowledgeable programmer, I have been able to develop a high proficiency in my trade at an age when many are still completing high school. My education continues, though, through problems and solutions encountered on the job, through yet more books, and through formal college classes.

The flexible schedule that homeschooling affords, then, has contributed greatly both to my general education and to proficiency in programming. From allowing development of a laundry basket of interests, to permitting pursuit of a colorful picture of imaginary numbers, to providing a paycheck for learning programming, freedom from a rigid class schedule has allowed me to develop a broad basis of thought, to delve deeply into areas of special interest, and to further develop some of those interests into a career through “apprenticeship” training. Whether devouring baskets of books or manipulating bytes, a liberally structured education has been, is, and will continue to be an integral, valuable part of my life.

*I remember only one of my instructor’s notes on this particular paper: above the text regarding apprenticeship’s perceived superiority as a teaching method, he wrote “Amen!”

Homeschooling – Truthseeker

July 18, 2008

Originally posted 2005-08-01

I really had not planned on posting this morning; instead, I hoped to catch on some hours from past weeks. However, as I surfed a few blogs before clocking in, I came across Truthseeker’s post about homeschooling, at which he invited comments. The article (Home Schools Run By Well-Meaning Amateurs: Schools With Good Teachers Are Best-Suited to Shape Young Minds, by Dave Arnold) that he linked to annoyed me enough that just now–a couple of hours later–I finally finished and posted my comment there.

For more (local) ramblings on the subject, see this.

Update: It appears that my comment was cut off on Truthseeker’s site; it’s posted in full below:

Although I haven’t delved nearly as deeply into the philosophical arguments for home-schooling as have my parents, I’m grateful to have been homeschooled from kindergarten through high school. Mr. Arnold’s article strikes me as a nice bit of unsubstantiated polemic. Although there’s no inherent shame in Arnold’s position as “head custodian”, I find it interesting that he’d consider that position sufficient to prescribe the best mode of education while disparaging the “wannabes” who feel themselves qualified to teach their own children.

Although I don’t have time to write a long essay regarding this, let me address several of his points briefly:

“Experienced pros” – See University Diaries and The Phantom Professor for some “insider views” of how educational institutions operate. In a college chemistry class, I frequently found myself correcting the instructor on exam answers; in computer-science classes, I occasionally found myself ahead of the teacher in learning the subject.

“It’s not as difficult as it looks” – He has a bit of a point–homeschooling does require a lot of effort and dedication on the part of the parents/teachers. However, I’d posit that most parents have sufficient mastery of at least K-8 subjects to teach them (admittedly, often with some “refreshers” on the parents’ part necessary). The ultra-small “class sizes” and feedback that home-schooling offer would, I’d think, tend to alleviate whatever gaps may exist in the parent’s knowledge, as parent and child learn together with the advantage of the parent’s experience in information-finding and processing. I find it somewhat difficult to comment meaningfully on this, as my mother holds a degree in education and my father engages in various sorts of research in his spare time.

“What about socialization? Forget about it!” – Both sides hold valid points here. Home-schooling can lead to social “bubble babies”, but most of the home-schoolers I know put forth substantial effort to integrate their children into some sort of social network, whether that’s through a local home-schoolers group, through church, or through other methods. An uncle who teaches at a private college once commented that the biggest problem he sees with homeschooled students is their tendency to spread themselves too thin, engaging in so many extracurricular activities that they approach burn-out. This hardly sounds like under-socialization to me. For another person’s perspective on home-schoolers as “team players”, see the Business Reform article “Bulding the Perfect Geek…Homeschool Style”.

“Visit our online bookstore.” – He seems to be runnning out of criticisms; it seems fairly self-evident that “Buying a history, science or math book does not mean an adult can automatically instruct others about the book’s content.”

“Gullible Parents” – For whatever reason, it does seem as though the “gullibility ratio” is somewhat higher among Christians, and perhaps among home-schoolers as well (perhaps primarily in the intersection of these groups?). I have no statistical evidence whatsoever to back this up; it’s solely my perception. Arnold characterizes withdrawing children from public schools as “fighting the laws that govern our education system”, a characterization that I find faulty. Much of the fight “against” education-related laws has already been fought; for many home-schoolers, this is simply an expression of their legally granted freedom of choice.

“No Training” – Mr. Arnold asks whether parents don’t “have a tough enough job teaching their children social, disciplinary and behavioral skills,” and asserts that they should leave teaching of academic subjects to “those who are knowledgeable, trained and motivated to do the best job possible.” I find his comments laughable. A recent Fortune article describes just how successful these “professionals” have been in educating America’s students; the previously mentioned University Diaries and Phantom Professor provide more views of these “professionals”. I should note that I don’t intend to disparage the entire teaching profession; to do so would be foolhardy, in light of the many examples of excellent, dedicated teachers. I do, however, believe that it’s equally worthy of ridicule to ignore the many flaws in the system for the sake of a glowing contrast against the evils of poor, un-educated home-schoolers attempting in their own bumbling ways to teach their children.

I’m not sure what points of Mr. Arnold’s this addresses, but I’m glad that I was home-schooled. I haven’t even addressed many of the benefits–or the drawbacks that Mr. Arnold’s rant didn’t have time to address–that accrue from home-schooling, but my experience differs sharply from the picture that he paints of home-schooling. Through home-schooling, I have learned the joy of life-long learning. Home-schooling provided the opportunity and fed the desire to read widely. At an age when many of my peers are anticipating their first jobs, I’m approaching my 6-year anniversary in my job as a software developer. I have maintained a 4.0 GPA through most of a bachelor’s degree, taken part-time as I’ve had opportunity. And yet, my academic achievements, such as they are, pale in comparison to those of many home-schoolers, and to those of numerous students in China and India. Before casting stones at home-schooling, perhaps Mr. Arnold would do well to—at least—incorporate some shatter-proof glazing into the vitreous construction of the NEA.